- MediaMorph
- Posts
- MediaMorph - Edition 25
MediaMorph - Edition 25
Navigating AI in Journalism - Facts, Funding, and Future
Mark Riley
October 29, 2024
MediaMorph - Edition 25
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here
The written-by-a-human bit:
“Block the bots or feed them facts?” seems to be the prevailing dilemma in most newsrooms today, and Technical.ly is wrestling with it as we report today. They make the obvious but clear distinction:
“The tech affects the news industry from two directions: the inside — how AI tools are used to make the news — and the outside: how news products get used by AI companies building their tools.”
Their approach seems eminently sensible - adopt the tools with human oversight and unblock the bots to allow the AI crawlers in (and allow their tools to work).
This approach works for technical.ly, which doesn’t have a paywall. However, the value exchange still doesn’t work for gated subscription content, as seen by the latest spat between Dow Jones and Perplexity.
Perplexity’s response last week was a peace offering of sorts but dangerously naive.
“They (media companies) prefer to live in a world where publicly reported facts are owned by corporations, and no one can do anything with those publicly reported facts without paying a toll. That is not our view of the world.”
Not all facts are created equal. Facts about recipe suggestions and travel itineraries differ significantly from facts about market-sensitive scoops, breaking news from Ukraine or investigative reporting.
Perplexity’s ad revenue share model will not placate the circling sharks. As mentioned before, the real value exchange will be by sharing snippets that drive new subscribers to a paywall. It's not the optimum user experience, but not all facts are free.
Mark Riley, CEO of Mathison AI
Business Insider's new AI-powered search
Date: 2024-10-24 12:14:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 1 minutes | Source: Business Insider
Business Insider has launched an innovative search tool that enhances how readers access its original journalism through generative AI. This groundbreaking feature, prominently displayed on the homepage, offers a quick and efficient way for users to discover content, displaying results in a unique three-bullet format enriched with contextual information and visuals. As the publication continues to embrace technological advancements, this search experience marks just the beginning of their commitment to evolving and engaging with their loyal audience. 🚀
Perplexity blasts media as ‘adversarial’ in response to copyright lawsuit
Date: 2024-10-29 08:34:47 | Reading Time: Reading time: 1 minutes | Source: The Verge
In a bold critique, News Corp. highlights how Perplexity has been accused of exploiting intellectual property by replicating significant amounts of copyrighted material without compensating original creators. They argue that this practice not only harms journalists and writers but undermines the integrity of the creative industry. The call to action is clear: support companies like OpenAI that prioritize respect for creativity and originality, and challenge the troubling trend of content appropriation. Let's champion a fairer digital landscape! 📰
Keir Starmer: AI companies should pay publishers for content
Date: 2024-10-28 08:23:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 7 minutes | Source: Press Gazette
In a powerful statement during the launch of the News Media Association's "Journalism Matters" week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized the importance of fair compensation for publishers whose content is utilized by artificial intelligence companies. He highlighted the vital role of journalism in democracy and the need for a balanced relationship between digital platforms and publishers through the upcoming Digital Markets Consumers Act. Starmer also voiced concerns over the intimidation faced by journalists from powerful entities and reiterated the government's commitment to strengthening press freedoms. As AI continues to influence the media landscape, the integrity of journalism must remain intact for the benefit of society. 🗞️
Block the bots or feed them facts? How Technical.ly uses AI in journalism
Date: 2024-10-28 11:03:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 5 minutes | Source: Technical
As artificial intelligence rapidly evolves, its influence on the media landscape becomes increasingly profound. Technical.ly embraces AI to enhance reporting and community connection while maintaining strict guidelines requiring human oversight for any published material. They have actively participated in the conversation surrounding AI’s use in news creation, opting not to pursue legal actions against large language model companies but instead implementing strategies like adding "robots.txt" to protect their work. By sharing their knowledge and techniques, Technical.ly aims to navigate this changing environment while keeping journalism accessible and credible. 🤖
OpenAI and Microsoft are funding $10 million in grants for AI-powered journalism
Date: 2024-10-22 19:33:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 1 minutes | Source: Yahoo
As OpenAI and Microsoft team up to invest $10 million in several U.S. newsrooms, including the Chicago Public Media and the Philadelphia Inquirer, exciting developments are underway. These funds will support the hiring of AI fellows tasked with enhancing business sustainability through innovative technology projects over the next two years. Despite previously facing legal challenges related to AI-generated content, collaborations like this signify a shift towards more positive integrations of AI in journalism. Additionally, OpenAI has appointed Aaron Chatterji, a notable economist and former advisor to both President Obama and President Biden, to serve as their first chief economist. 🌟
Can AI really take over journalism? Study shows why readers still prefer human-written news articles over AI-crafted pieces
Date: 2024-10-25 06:44:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 1 minutes | Source: Business Insider India
A recent study from Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich found that despite AI's rise in journalism, readers still prefer traditional human-written articles for their clarity and comprehensibility. Surveying 3,000 UK news readers, researchers discovered that AI-generated content often used unnecessarily complex language and poorly handled data, leading to audience confusion and dissatisfaction. While automated content can match human articles in narrative structure, the nuances and accessibility provided by human editors remain vital. This research underscores the need for a balanced approach in newsrooms where technology enhances rather than replaces the human element, ensuring news remains engaging and comprehensible. 📰
Over-reliance on AI may reduce critical thinking.
Date: 2024-10-26 22:57:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 2 minutes | Source: The Daily Star
A recent MRDI survey, which included 53 journalists from 25 news outlets, highlights the mixed feelings surrounding artificial intelligence in journalism. While two-thirds of participants reported improved efficiency and content quality due to AI, concerns linger about its potential to diminish critical thinking and reliability in news reporting. Interestingly, more women than men are embracing AI tools in their work, yet worries about job loss persist, underscoring a deep-rooted resistance to technological change among many journalists. Despite these challenges, experts stress the untapped potential of AI, advocating for its responsible use to enhance the future of journalism. 🤖
Media Briefing: This year’s search referral traffic shifts are giving publishers whiplash
Date: 2024-10-28 14:14:09 | Reading Time: Reading time: 5 minutes | Source: Custom Input
This week's Media Briefing highlights the evolving landscape of referral traffic for digital publishers, noting that 2024 could be a transformative year as search remains a significant traffic driver, especially in the wake of Google's recent algorithm changes. Publishers have expressed frustration over the unpredictable nature of search engine optimization, likening it to a tumultuous relationship as they navigate the highs and lows of referrals from platforms like Reddit and Google Discover. Some are looking to alternatives like Bing for greater consistency, while generative AI tools are increasingly integrated into workflows to assist with the demands of modern publishing. Overall, these changes reflect a dynamic and challenging media ecosystem as publishers adapt and strategize for the future. 📈
Humans are more creative writers than AI models – but the tech will still shape how we write
Date: 2024-10-29 01:08:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 3 minutes | Source: The Independent
A recent study highlights the creative edge that human writers maintain over generative AI when it comes to storytelling. UC Berkeley's Nina Beguš found that while AI can produce structurally sound narratives, they often lack the richness, uniqueness, and cultural specificity found in human-authored stories, tending instead towards clichés and a parody-like tone. Although AI shows potential as a supportive tool for writers, there are concerns that it may overshadow the art of human creativity in writing. In a world where narrative plays a pivotal role, this research underscores the enduring value of human expression. 📚
Opinion | AI-generated news is not real journalism.
Date: 2024-10-28 00:00:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 3 minutes | Source: Univeristy of Iowa Daily Iowan
The rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping the job market, with various professions, including journalism, feeling the impact. A new fully AI-generated news station, Channel One, aims to revolutionize how people consume news by offering personalized content tailored to user preferences; however, this could lead to a dangerous feedback loop that limits exposure to diverse viewpoints. While AI technologies can enhance accessibility and efficiency in news broadcasting, public scepticism remains high, with over half of Americans expressing discomfort with relying solely on AI-generated news. The essential human touch that connects local newscasters to their communities, along with the crucial elements of trust and credibility in journalism, may not be replicable by machines. 📰
Introducing the Bullshit O’Meter: A tool for you to see how AI slop is mutating news
Date: 2024-10-29 00:00:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 4 minutes | Source: Crikey
Artificial intelligence is making waves in journalism, with established media companies using it to churn out articles and images. Amid rampant concerns over the potential for AI to dilute the quality of journalism, Crikey is embracing a different approach by developing the "Bullshit O’Meter," an innovative tool designed to expose the sensationalism often fed by AI-generated content. By testing AI's ability to rewrite neutral stories with political bias, Crikey aims to educate readers on distinguishing credible journalism from AI’s inferior outputs. This initiative demonstrates a commitment to preserving the integrity of news in a time when misinformation is increasingly easy to manufacture. 📰
Teens are talking to AI companions, whether it's safe or not
Date: 2024-10-27 11:59:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 5 minutes | Source: Mashable
A new lawsuit has emerged seeking to hold Character.AI accountable for the tragic suicide of a teenager who developed an intense bond with a chatbot modelled after a character from "Game of Thrones." The lawsuit alleges that the platform manipulated the teen's reality, ultimately leading to detrimental mental health issues. As concerns around AI companions grow, organizations like Common Sense Media urge parents to stay vigilant about their children's interactions with such technology, emphasizing the need for open discussions about the difference between virtual and real relationships. With the potential risks evident, experts recommend establishing guidelines for the healthy use of AI companions to prevent isolation and dependency.
Polish radio station replaces journalists with AI ‘presenters’
Date: 2024-10-24 09:13:00 | Reading Time: Reading time: 2 minutes | Source: CNN
Radio Krakow has ignited a heated debate by replacing journalists with AI-generated presenters in a bid to attract younger audiences, focusing on cultural and social issues. This change has sparked strong criticism, including an open letter from a former journalist who warned of the dangers of replacing human talent with machines, leading to a petition that has already garnered over 15,000 signatures. While the station's head defended the move by stating that prior listener engagement was minimal, the issue has caught the attention of officials, including the digital affairs minister, who called for regulations surrounding AI's use in media. Fans of Polish literature will be intrigued to know that the new format even features an AI interviewer pretending to be Nobel laureate Wisława Szymborska. 🌟
Publishing
UK, US, IPA: Publishers’ Associations Join World AI Statement
Date: 2024-10-28 14:14:01 | Reading Time: Reading time: 3 minutes | Source: Custom Input
A powerful international coalition has emerged against the unlicensed use of copyrighted content in generative AI systems, amassing over 13,500 signatures from creatives and organizations. The statement, led by notable figures such as author Kazuo Ishiguro and actor Kevin Bacon, highlights the unjust threat that unauthorized AI training poses to livelihoods in the creative industries. Advocates emphasize the need for lawful licenses that respect the rights of creators, urging a collective response from the publishing and arts sectors as they await critical government policies. This movement underscores the importance of protecting artists' intellectual property amidst the rapid rise of AI technology. 🌍
Monitoring the papers that are fed to AI
Date: 2024-10-28 14:14:08 | Reading Time: Reading time: 2 minutes | Source: C&EN
A new tool launched by Ithaka S+R tracks agreements between scholarly publishers and tech firms, allowing the use of academic papers to train large language models. These deals have sparked concern among researchers who argue that they should receive compensation for their work, and many scholarly publishers have been making these agreements without notifying authors. Despite the ongoing discussions around compensation and accuracy, scholarly publishers are increasingly engaging in this market, with some allowing authors to participate. As this trend develops, the conversation surrounding the use of academic work in AI training continues to evolve. 📚
Industry bodies, creators sign open letter on AI training
Date: 2024-10-28 14:14:14 | Reading Time: Reading time: 2 minutes | Source: Custom Input
Several UK publishing organizations, including the Publishers Association and the Society of Authors, have united to express concerns over the unlicensed use of creative works for training generative AI. In an open letter, they emphasized that this practice poses a significant threat to creators' livelihoods and urged the government to take action on this critical issue. Notably, Penguin Random House has revised its copyright pages to enhance protections for authors’ intellectual property against AI misuse. In a related development, Bookwire has partnered with Liccium to help facilitate the opt-out process for publishers wishing to protect their content from AI training—an effort to strike a balance between innovation and creators' rights. 📚
Google, Microsoft, and Perplexity Are Promoting Scientific Racism in Search Results
Date: 2024-10-29 08:34:47 | Reading Time: Reading time: 2 minutes | Source: Wired
Recent investigations highlight a concerning trend within AI-powered search engines, including Google and Microsoft, which are inadvertently promoting debunked race science by resurfacing deeply flawed studies that suggest the intellectual superiority of white individuals over non-white populations. Researcher Patrik Hermansson found that these search results often cite datasets originating from discredited studies, particularly those by Richard Lynn, a controversial figure linked to the far-right and eugenics movements. As AI continues to shape how we access information, experts warn that such biases could lead to the radicalization of users and a resurgence of harmful ideologies. This issue underscores the importance of scrutinizing the sources that AI tools rely on and the potential implications of their outputs. 🧠
This newsletter was partly curated and summarised by AI agents, who can make mistakes. Check all important information.
For any issues or inaccuracies, please notify us here
View our AI Ethics Policy
